[MLUG] Re: Encryption and the law


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nathan Hruby <nhruby AT gmail.com>
  • To: mlug-list AT mail.milwaukeelug.org
  • Subject: [MLUG] Re: Encryption and the law
  • Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:56:47 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eyx5cOg/SpAuL/liSqXdGGOmelC2wZxDLqavxLB+4ALiByU97FqxnsGqGL+fTAQ4nO H7GQ6rYeMDP7WUohqrKE+cpaYdVtsp1c7Ov09A2TzlvDWUZhfxOFDX6/Z3VTmrUZMWsW zQPMwN/7u6aiNOLDEAzR0ysi7j8/KhjJBza7w=

It's absolute crap like this that makes MLUG an inhospitable place for
any sane person looking for more information on Linux.  Thanks for
taking the whole community down a notch in terms of respectability
with one post.

-n

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Joe Baker 
<joebaker AT dcresearch.com>
 wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> My dear friends,
>
> It has come to my realization that among the many reasons for the
> persecution of me by the governments is that I am skilled at encryption
> and building secured computer systems that are extremely difficult to
> hack into using the normal tools available them.
>

[nrh: snip previous]



-- 
-------------------------------------------
nathan hruby 
<nhruby AT gmail.com>
metaphysically wrinkle-free
-------------------------------------------



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§